Cutting Edge Urology
T his PDF belongs to matthew.hooson@springer.co INTERVENTIONAL ULTRASOUND: TRANSPERINEAL AND TRANSRECTAL PROSTATIC BIOPSY • 29 14. Adamakis I, Mitropoulos D, Haritopoulos K et al (2004) Pain during transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate of lidocaine-prilocaine cream. World J Urol 22(4):281–284. 15. Acher P, Dooldeniya M (2013) Prostate biopsy: will transperineal replace transrectal? BJU Int 112:533–534. 16. Pepe P, Aragona F (2014) Prostate biopsy: results and advantages of the transperineal approach – twentyyear experience of a single center. World J Urol 32:373–377. 17. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Briers E, van den Bergh RCN, Bolla M, van Casteren NJ, Cornford P, Culine S, Joniau S, Lam T, Mason MD, Matveev V, van der Poel H, van der Kwast TH, Rouvière O, Wiegel T (2015) Prostate cancer guidelines. European Association of Urology. 18. Ravery V, Goldblatt L, Royer B, Blanc E, Toublanc M, Boccon-Gibod L (2000) Extensive biopsy protocol improves the detection rate of prostate cancer. J Urol 164:393–396. 19. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL (1997) Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 157:199–202. 20. Beurton D, Izadifar V, Barthelemy Y, Desgrippes A, Fontaine E (2000) 12 systematic prostate biopsies are superior to sextant biopsies for diagnosing carcinoma: a prospective randomised study. Eur Urol 37:296–299. 21. Scattoni V, Raber M, Abdollah F, Roscigno M, Dehò F, Angiolilli D, Maccagnano C, Gallina A, Capitanio U, Freschi M, Doglioni C, Rigatti P, Montorsi F (2010) Biopsy schemes with the fewest cores for detecting 95% of the prostate cancers detected by a 24-core biopsy. Eur Urol 57:1–8. 22. Pepe P, Aragona F (2005) Prostate needle biopsy: 12 vs. 18 cores – is it necessary? Urol Int 74:19–22. 23. Cormio L, Scattoni V, Lorusso F, Perrone A, Di Fino G, Selvaggio O, Sanguedolce F, Bufo P, Montorsi F, Carrieri G (2014) Prostate cancer detection rates in different biopsy schemes. Which cores for which patients? World J Urol 32:341–346. 24. Abdollah F, Novara G, Briganti A, Scattoni V, Raber M, Roscigno M, Suardi N, Gallina A, Artibani W, Ficarra V, Cestari A, Guazzoni G, Rigatti P, Montorsi F (2011) Trans-rectal versus trans-perineal saturation rebiopsy of the prostate: is there a difference in cancer detection rate? Urology 77:921–925. 25. Remzi M, Fong YK, Dobrovits M, Anagnostou T, Seitz C, Waldert M, Harik M, Marihart S, Marberger M, Djavan B (2005) The Vienna nomogram: validation of a novel biopsy strategy defining the optimal number of cores based on patient age and total prostate volume. J Urol 174:1256–1260. 26. Shen PF, Zhu YC, Wei WR, Li YZ, Yang J, Li YT, Li DM, Jia Wang J, Zeng H (2012) The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 14: 310–315. 27. Stewart CS, Leibovich BC, Weaver AL, Lieber MM (2001) Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. J Urol 166:86–91. 28. Rabets JC, Jones JS, Patel A, Zippe CD (2004) Prostate cancer detection with office based saturation biopsy in a repeat biopsy population. J Urol 172:94–97. 29. Fandella A, Bertaccini A, Consonni P, Introini C, Gunelli R, Gruppo Italiano Biopsia Prostatica (2005) Prostate biopsy: re-biopsy after first negative biopsy. Arch Ital Urol Androl 77:39–49. 30. Pepe P, Aragona F (2007) Saturation prostate needle biopsy and prostate cancer detection at initial and repeat evaluation. Urology 70:1131–1135. 31. Pepe P, Dibenedetto G, Pennisi M, Fraggetta F, Colecchia M, Aragona F (2014) Detection rate of anterior prostate cancer in 226 patients submitted to initial and repeat transperineal biopsy. Urol Int 93:189–192. 32. Mabjeesh NJ, Lidawi G, Chen J, German L, Matzkin H (2012) High detection rate of significant prostate tumours in anterior zones using transperineal ultrasound-guided template saturation biopsy. BJU Int 110:993–997. 33. Seles M, Gutschi T, Mayrhofer K, Fischereder K, Ehrlich G, Gallé G, Gutschi S, Pachernegg O, Pummer K, Augustin H (2015) Sampling of the anterior apical region results in increased cancer detection and upgrading in transrectal repeat saturation biopsy of the prostate. BJU Int 117(4):592–597. doi:10.1111/bju.13108. 34. Orikasa K, Ito A, Ishidoya S, Saito S , Endo M, Arai Y (2008) Anterior apical biopsy: is it useful for prostate cancer detection? Int J Urol 15:900–904 . 35. Galosi AB, Tiro li M, Cantoro D, Conti A, Muzzonigro G (2010) Biopsy of the anterior prostate gland: technique with end-fire tran srectal u ltrasound. Arch Ital Urol Androl 82:248–252. 36. Hossack T, Patel MI, H uo A, Brenner P, Yuen C, Spernat D, Mathews J, Haynes AM, Sutherland R, del Prado W, Stricker P (2012) Location and pathological characteristics of cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens identified by transperineal biopsy compared to transrectal biopsy. J Urol 188:781–785. 37. Fernandez Gomez JM, Garcia Rodriguez J (2014) Optimization of prostate biopsy in patients considered for active surveillance. The role of the confirmatory biopsy and transperineal techniques. Arch Esp Urol 67:409–418. 38. Symons JL, Huo A, Yuen CL, Haynes AM, Matthews J, Sutherland RL, Brenner P, Stricker PD (2013) Outcomes of transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy in 409 patients. BJU Int 112:585–593. Cutting EDGE_Urology(SUN)_final.indd 29 27-Mar-18 10:00:30 AM
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NTk0NjQ=